Showing posts with label Debts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Debts. Show all posts

July 18, 2022

Prioritizing Debts in a Probate Case

When a person passes away, they will invariably have some debt. This can take the form of a mortgage, a credit card bill, hospital expenses, cell phone bill, car insurance, etc.

A primary duty of any estate administration matter, whether probate or non-probate, is to itemize and categorize these debts. 

Once the decedent's debts have been itemized and categorized, the next step is to prioritize the debts. Yes not all debts are created equal. The following is the order of priority for creditors:

1. Administration expenses—for obligations secured by a mortgage, deed of trust, or other lien, only the administration expenses that are reasonably related to the administration of the secured property are given priority (Prob C §11420(a)(1));

2. Obligations secured by a mortgage, deed of trust, or other lien, including a judgment lien, to the extent that they can be paid out of the property subject to the lien—if the property is insufficient, the unsatisfied obligation is a general debt (Prob C §11420(a)(2));

3. Funeral expenses (Prob C §11420(a)(3));

4. Expenses of last illness (Prob C §11420(a)(4));

5. Family allowance (Prob C §11420(a)(5));

6. Wage claims (Prob C §11420(a)(6)); and

7. General debts (Prob C §11420(a)(7)).
 
A recent unpublished appellate decision addressed the issue of prioritizing debts:
 
"Appellant David Downs is serving as the administrator of the estate of Shawna Graham. The estate's primary asset is a piece of real property that Downs wants to sell for $365,000. The property is over-encumbered. Respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo), is the beneficiary of a deed of trust on the property and is owed approximately $338,000; Matadors Community Credit Union (Matadors) has a security interest in a solar energy system installed on the property and is owed approximately $29,000; and decedent owed the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) approximately $40,000 in unpaid federal taxes. The costs of selling the property will be approximately $39,000, and Downs contends he and his attorney are entitled to approximately $66,500 in administrative expenses. If the property is sold for $365,000, there will not be enough money to pay all these debts."
 
The administrator then filed a petition to determine the order of payment if the property were to be sold. The administrator sought to have payment be made in the following order:
         
• $40,059 in federal taxes be placed in a trust account.

• $66,537 in costs of administration be placed in a trust account.

• $39,408 in costs of sale be paid directly to the parties to whom they are owed.

• $224,131 to Wells Fargo to partially pay off the mortgage.

• $0 to Matadors.

The trial court denied the requested order in its entirety. On appeal, the appellate court affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Estate of Graham, Placer County Superior Court, case # SPR0009820.

February 4, 2014

Spendthrift Clause


Great Wall of China
Some people are fortunate to be prudent with money. These people live within their means and do not spend lavishly or superfluously. The necessities of life such as food, clothing and shelter are accounted for, with the occasional luxury sprinkled in. Conversely, there are those cursed by profligate spending. These people make reckless spending decisions, much to their detriment. Silly items such as fancy cars, jewelry and clothes often are associated with these people.

In the context of estate planning, a person is able to somewhat protect the free-spending beneficiary from themselves by inserting a spendthrift clause into their trust. This clause generally bars a creditor from attaching to the beneficiary's interest in the principal, income or both of a trust. Prob C § 15300.

For example, Samuel established a trust for his irreverent nephew Benito. This trust was to benefit Benito during his lifetime. In the trust, Samuel wrote that Benito's interest in the principal and income of the trust was not subject to voluntary or involuntary transfer. This amounted to a spendthrift provision as Samuel was concerned that Benito's recklessness would jeopardize his trust funds. Samuel had worked tirelessly in life and wanted to benefit Benito, as opposed to a creditor. 

Unfortunately Benito is spell-bound by a black Friday sale at a local retail store and incurs a massive credit card bill. Naturally Benito is unable to pay this bill and the credit card company obtains a money judgment against Benito. However, since the trust had a spendthrift provision, the credit card company cannot simply demand payment from Benito's trust. Rather, the creditor can either wait until a distribution is made to Benito from the trust or it can petition the court to direct Samuel to pay Benito's portion of trust principal and then collect. CCP § 709.010.

While California provides for a collection method as stated above, many creditors do not wish to engage in this for multiple reasons. First, it is expensive and time-consuming to petition a court to direct a trustee to satisfy the money judgment on behalf of the beneficiary-debtor. Second, if the trustee already paid the money to the beneficiary, the creditor has to be timely in their collection methods. The phrase "here today gone tomorrow" is apropos because the beneficiary can spend as they see fit when they receive it. They are under no duty to wait for the creditor to attach the judgment to it. This can easily disintegrate into a game of cat and mouse which taxes anyone's patience. 

To be clear, a spendthrift provision is not an impregnable barrier that will thwart the attempts of any creditor. A determined creditor can collect their judgment provided they have available funds, time and patience. Yet for many creditors, this can be seen as a lost cause because there is an opportunity cost for everything. Time spent chasing down a debtor like Benito sacrifices time that could have been spent chasing down a debtor with potential easier to attach assets.

September 21, 2010

Anti-deficiency Real Estate Laws in California


In response to the Great Depression of the 1930s, the California legislature passed a series of borrower-friendly laws that severely restricted the remedies available to lenders in case of foreclosure. 

These laws bar deficiency judgments in the case of non-judicial foreclosure, Civil Code Section 580d, and purchase money mortgages, Civil Code Section 580b. The focus of this post is to show the relationship between the anti-deficiency laws and estate planning. Yes, there is a connection.   

In short, Civil Code Section 580d and Civil Code Section 580b say that in the case of a (1) non-judicial foreclosure sale of real property or (2) a property secured by  purchase money mortgage, a deficiency judgment will be prohibited in both instances. Now that I have given the lawyer's definition of the anti-deficiency law I can proceed with the everyday language explanation.

1. Non-judicial Foreclosure

A non-judicial foreclosure is a transaction done outside of court supervision. The sale usually occurs on the courthouse steps. For example, in Santa Clara County, non-judicial foreclosure sales happen routinely at 10:00 am on the backside of the Superior Court located at 191 N First Street San Jose, CA 95113.

2. Purchase money mortgage

A purchase money mortgage is a mortgage in which the loan proceeds are applied to the purchase of home itself. For example, borrower obtains a loan from lender to purchase his residential home. This would qualify as a purchase money mortgage.

3. Deficiency judgment

A deficiency judgment occurs in a foreclosure sale when the asset securing the loan is sold for less than the value of the loan. For example, borrower obtains a $400k loan on a $500k home in 2005. In 2010, the loan has been paid down to $375k but the home is now $200k. Borrower, unable to make the payments due to financial hardship, losses the home to a foreclosure sale in 2010. At this foreclosure sale, the house is sold for $200k. Since the lender cannot recoup its money from the foreclosure sale, the bank would like to pursue a deficiency judgment against the borrower for $175k.

Civil Code Section 580(b), (d) and Estate Planning

Now that you have a decent understanding of the nuances of the anti-deficiency laws, you should be able to apply these laws to estate planning.

Assume that you are either the successor trustee of your parents' living trust or you are the executor of your parents' probate estate. Your parents purchased their family home a few years during the boom years of the 2000s. Now in 2010 however, the house is under water in that the value of the home is eclipsed by the value of the loan. The loan is $500k and the home is worth $350k for instance. Furthermore, your parents' estate lacks the necessary liquidity to pay off the mortgage, namely your parents' estate is cash poor. You are concerned that the bank will foreclose on the property and seek a deficiency judgment against the other assets of your parents' estate, presumably your inheritance. However, Civil Code Section 580b explicitly bars such an action by the bank because the mortgage was a purchase money mortgage. Thus, the deficiency incurred as a result of the foreclosure sale of your parents' home will not affect the other assets of the estate.

December 4, 2009

Probate Creditor Claims



The following is an overview of who gets priority when satisfying a decedent's debt during probate. 


1. Administration expenses—for obligations secured by a mortgage, deed of trust, or other lien, only the administration expenses that are reasonably related to the administration of the secured property are given priority (Prob C §11420(a)(1));

2. Obligations secured by a mortgage, deed of trust, or other lien, including a judgment lien, to the extent that they can be paid out of the property subject to the lien—if the property is insufficient, the unsatisfied obligation is a general debt (Prob C §11420(a)(2));

3. Funeral expenses (Prob C §11420(a)(3));

4. Expenses of last illness (Prob C §11420(a)(4));

5. Family allowance (Prob C §11420(a)(5));

6. Wage claims (Prob C §11420(a)(6)); and

7. General debts (Prob C §11420(a)(7)).